Tourists watching the sunrise at Uluru |
Uluru, the Red Heart of
Australia. Can one tread on it? For the people who have lived here
for millennia this is a sacred place. It is an altar. Sacred
ceremonies are performed at its foot. Contact with the invisible
world of ancestors is made here. Contact with the world of dreamings.
Stories of Dreamtime are told here.
There is a footpath for tourists
around Uluru. Tourists keep shooting photos one after another but in
some places there are notice boards saying: “This is a sacred
place, please refrain from taking pictures here”. Some even respect
these notices.
The
heart of Australia. Can one tread on it? There is a notice board
before the entry to the trail leading to the top saying: “Please
refrain from climbing the mountain, this is a holy place”. Some
even respect this notice, too. Nevertheless when the trail is open –
which is not always the case because the mountain can be dangerous,
many people have died there – the crowd of people climbing look
from afar like ants. Mountains are there to be climbed, aren't they?
Who would worry about superstitions of stone age people? Who would
worry about the fact that “the owner of the dreaming” lives
nearby and that the dreaming says that the mountain should not be
climbed. Who would worry about the Aborigines anyway? They are
probably the most primitive people on earth, aren't they? Not only
they walked naked in the desert and didn't erect any buildings of
stone, they didn't even have any political organisation, nobody to
buy land from. The British Crown tried to act legally wherever
possible and where it could be done the land for colonies was bought
from local leaders. Even American Indians had their chiefs with whom
treaties could be negotiated and from whom land could be bought, but
the Australian Aborigines didn't even have chiefs. There was complete
anarchy, every family acted on its own. Families owned dreamings
connected to certain places but how can one buy a dreaming? Even if
that were possible, does a dreaming entitle one to own the land?
Anyway the concept of dremings was definitely beyond the mental
horizon of the representatives of the British Crown in the 19th
century. They simply decided that land in Australia had no owners and
was for the taking.
Aborigines watching tourists watching the sunset. |
And they took it. Initially for
agriculture. Later, in places where it didn't rain enough to grow any
crops, for pastures. Somebody lived there already and lived off
hunting kangaroos? They could work as stockmen on sheep farms, after
all a position of a stockman is more prestigious than a lizard
hunter. Lizard hunter, because all the kangaroos vanished from the
land where sheep ate all the grass.
Some Aborigines did indeed work
as stockmen, but not all. Some ran away even farther to the desert,
to places where it didn't pay to keep sheep. They'd rather eat
lizards than have anything to do with those intruders who come and
take land as if it didn't belong to anybody, who have no respect for
holy places and simply tread on them. Or erect buildings of stone on
them and put up fences of barbed wire around.
In 1901 Australia gained
independence. That is – the intruders gained independence and those
people who had lived there earlier weren't even considered citizens
of the new country. It was assumed that they were too primitive and
wouldn't understand what 'to be a citizen' means. It was also assumed
that the state will look after them until such a time when they do
understand this. They had to be civilised. Special settlements were
built in which this civilizing was to be conducted. The biggest of
those settlements and certainly the best known was Papunya, situated
some 240 kilometres west from Alice Springs. Nomad Aborigines from
various, often very distant peoples have been gathered there. From
Arrente people, whose lands used to be in the east, around Alice
Springs. From Pitjantjatjara people, who used to live in the south,
around the holy mountain of Uluru. From Pintupi people, who until
recently lived far to the west, in the Gibson Desert. They were
brought in lorries to be civilized. They were given clothing to wear
because in Australia it is illegal to walk naked in public places.
They were given food and told to eat at the table because only
savages eat sitting on the ground. They weren't allowed to drink
alcohol because 'wards of the state' are like children. White
citizens of Australia could consume alcohol but the Aborigines
weren't citizens. Supplying alcohol to persons not allowed to consume
it was illegal and one could go to prison for that.
Uluru close up. |
Missionaries came to the desert
as well to provide spiritual food. The stone age superstitions had to
be uprooted. Not far from Papunya a Lutheran mission named
Hermannsburg was set up. Missionaries were good people, they saw the
misery of the Aborigines and brought material help, although their
main aim was to save souls. In their opinion the superstitions were a
barrier to salvation and could not be tolerated. Beliefs in dreamings
according to which a mountains was created by some ancestors had to
be uprooted because all the mountains have been created by God as the
Bible says. The missionaries could not tolerate wild dances to honour
that ancestor. They could not tolerate treating a mountain like an
altar. The Aborigines weren't daft and quickly understood that it is
better not to inform the missionaries about their ceremonies. The old
practices went underground, they were celebrated in secret.
Civilizing meant basically that the Aborigines copied superficial
behaviours of the intruders. If they were good at it they could even
get Australian citizenship.
Hermannsburg lies in a
picturesque area, among pink hills and greyish-green eucalypti. A
perfect country to come and paint with watercolours. This is exactly
what an artist named Rex Batterbee did in 1930s. He roamed the area
with his watercolours and painted. He even had an exhibition in
Hermannsburg. Aborigines also saw this exhibition and one of them,
named Albert Namatjira, asked the artist if he could teach him his
art. The artist agreed and Albert Namatjira learned it and became
quite good at it. He even had exhibitions in distant cities on the
coast. He became famous because he was a living proof that an
Aborigine can learn to paint pictures no worse than his white
teacher. In 1954 he was flown to Canberra to be presented to the
Queen and in 1957 he was even given Australian citizenship. And he
was earning real money selling pictures.
A picture from the Hermannsburg School |
Perhaps Albert Namatjira could
have became rich but for the ages-old law of the Aborigines that
tells them to share immediately whatever they have. Meat of a
kangaroo is divided and shared among the relatives and so is the
money gained by selling watercolours. According to the Australian law
Albert Namatjira could buy alcohol but according to the ages-old law
he could not consume it on his own. Here the two laws came into
conflict. One day Albert celebrated some occasion with his family,
having bought some drinks for the occasion and was promptly arrested
and sent to prison for supplying alcohol to persons not eligible.
That's the benefits of citizenship for you.
Albert Namatjira shared not only
possessions but also his skills. As the father teaches his sons to
use a spear so Albert Namatjira taught his sons and other relatives
how to paint. This is how 'The School of Hermannsburg' came into
being. The painters of this school painted watercolours depicting
landscapes of the desert heart of Australia. Virgin landscapes,
without people and without any sign of white man's activity.
Albert Namatjira became famous
but more as a curiosity than a great artist. His disciples did not
become famous at all. This kind of art is considered second-rate at
best, good enough perhaps to be sold to tourists as souvenirs. It
certainly is not traditional Aboriginal art, in their old society
there was no room for this kind of pictures. Where would a nomad
without a house hang a watercolour? Anyway, what would he need a
picture of a landscape for if he lived in this landscape for real?
There was, however, a secret in
those pictures that was hidden from white man's eye and there was no
point to explain it to him. Albert Namatjira did not choose the
subjects for his paintings because they were pretty views. White
buyers could think so but it was not the case. Albert Namatjira
painted what he was entitled to paint. He was the guardian of
dreamings connected to certain places and it was those places he
painted. A landscape is not just a landscape, a mountain is not just
a big rock. A mountain is a holy place, an altar not made with human
hands and this is what makes it holy.
What is a watercolour depicting
a holy mountain? Isn't it like an icon that tries to show us a
glimpse of the unseen world? Isn't it like an icon that reminds one
about a holy place? Especially if one does not live in that place any
more?
Kata Tjuta rocks near Uluru. |